Archive
I See I’m Not Going To Be Able To Write Until…

Two Klingon males and a female as they appear in the original television series episode “Day of the Dove”. The bronzed skin, facial hair, lack of ridged foreheads, and simple costumes are typical of The Original Series Klingons. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
I see I’m not going to be able to write until Star Trek Into Darkness premiers.
It’s not actually ‘writers block‘ as I know the basic plot and details of my three current writing projects. One of which is a freebie. Its more, my brain is so wrapped up in the puzzle, that is currently without a solution I find myself fixated on that… Alot…
Even Countdown To Darkness lacks context to understand what actually took place in the storyline, without answers provided in the movie itself. A genius bit of marketing there as it does not ruin the movie. Unlike the first countdown comics which illuminated Nero’s motives… We may, or may not of gotten that in these books. Only retrospect will provide context.
Also, the helmeted Klingon on the cover is probably Commander Kor. We know there are at least two Klingons with speaking roles and without helmets as well – With ridges.
Yeah this was a post about my writing… Sometimes my brain gets this way. Scattered and even though I know what I want to write, I just can’t get it down on paper.
Related articles
- Johnson Discusses “Star Trek: Countdown To Darkness” Finale (comicbookresources.com)
- ‘Star Trek Into Darkness’ Image; J.J. Abrams Talks Klingons and Carol Marcus (screenrant.com)
- J.J. Abrams Talks Klingons and the Role of Carol Marcus in STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS (collider.com)
- J.J. Abrams Promises Klingons Will Be In Star Trek Into Darkness (cynsworkshop.wordpress.com)
- Klingon Norgh-Class Bird-of-Prey (davidsonsellers.wordpress.com)
- How to Get Past the 10 Most Debilitating Sources of Writer’s Block [SlideShare] (rehavapress.com)
I Breath Life Into Thinking-Machines…
My children are not gears and sprockets, though each is calibrated precisely. I build them in different shapes, and ethnic varieties – Not that they share these human tribes DNA. Morningstars as you know, are not human. Yes, every model has its own skill sets which favor the disposition of that model’s physical and intellectual matrix. Even among clusters, no three are alike. Individualism persists, particular strengths will be greater or lesser than within a cluster. I’ve been asked how I create such diversity in my children. Its easy when I have my wife to help. The committee wonders why I spend so much time constructing distinctions? I’ll tell you why. For me this is an artistic affirmation. I breath life into thinking-machines.
– Dr. Turhan Korelia, Addressing GenKon INC. Board Of Directors
Epigraph from my new writing project, a spotlight story which follows “Among Bright Stars…“. It takes place a few months after book 2 and is meant to be another soft entry point for readers who might not have read books one or two. That is, you won’t need to know anything about either book to enjoy “November and Zeus“.
Related articles
- Clifford Nass On ‘Seductive’ Tech And Why You Treat Your Phone Like A Friend (huffingtonpost.com)
- The Gene Machine and Me (spectrum.ieee.org)
Death Of A Morningstar
Death of a Morningstar
Two shots.
Bang!
One to the backbone, in order to incapacitate is an astonishment, and brings him to his knees.
BANG!
The second slug hits the skull, which explodes in a cascade of sparks. Pieces of metal-looking bone fragments, an eyeball and blood spurt out as the cranium crumbles. Positronic filaments unspool, a furious crimson, they flicker, slowly revert to their normalized neon-blue color before final death and the threads of positronic brain turn blood drenched white.
A future scene from Neo-human book 3.
Related articles
- This Is Your Positronic Brain… (raptorsclaw.wordpress.com)
- Six scientists tell us about the most accurate science fiction in their fields (io9.com)
- Of Androids, Clones, And Morningstars… (raptorsclaw.wordpress.com)
Can We Stop This Stupid Assertion?
Can we stop this stupid assertion? If (IF!) the new Trek movie villain is Khan, it is no more a “reshash” than redoing Kirk, Spock, McCoy… ect. I keep running across this idea, that somehow if they reuse Khan it will be a rehash (and by implication boring) yet, however they already did a movie reusing existing characters and it was a rousing success. Using Khan (If it is him) is no more a rehash than using Kirk or Spock. What matters is how he is written and the actor tackles the material. Why do so many Trek fans have a “by the numbers” mentality of storytelling? That an element can only work in a single way and no other, just because they have not thought of it?
Related articles
- ‘Star Trek Into Darkness’ Teaser Sneaks In ‘Khan’ Reference (moviesblog.mtv.com)
- ‘Star Trek Into Darkness’ teaser unleashes destruction (herocomplex.latimes.com)
- ‘Star Trek Into Darkness’ Should Be The Re-Hash Of Khan (movieline.com)
- ‘Star Trek Into Darkness’ Online Trailer Premiere: We Just Want More (moviesblog.mtv.com)
- Star Trek: Into Darkness – Teaser Trailers and Cumberbatch! (grizzlybomb.com)
- And We Now Have a “Star Trek Into Darkness” Trailer (nerdist.com)
Group Testing…
This opinion is not going to be popular among my writing friends.
And – Some of you might have noticed I’ve been talking more about science fiction, and entertainment on this blog rather than writing, or even my own books – that’s totally on purpose.
Those who have been following this blog know I often compare authoring, and movie making, or just plain storytelling to painting, or sculpting. There seems to be an accepted amount of artistic purity (on the part of the artist) permitted within those fields of art, which is generally not accepted among writers and storytellers.
There are two things I hate: Writers who spoon feed a story, Dan Brown style to a reader, and I am not very keen on group testing a story or book – Yes I know that’s heretical to say.
Writers, unlike our compatriots in painting are expected to subject their work of art, or pulp to a series of Darwinian take downs disguised as “vetting” (by which I do not mean spell checking, or grammar fixes – that is the so-called technical things) that deconstructs whatever one’s own original vision had been, as indie authorship grows, and takes hold, this aspect has become part of the system.
The problem I have with this is. Often the advice given (though well-meaning) tends more to be a reflection of the person giving its own biases, and needs. One of the biggest issues I’ve noticed, people evaluate other people’s work by way of their own writing style, that is to say, we critique other people’s books based against our own body of work and expect for others writing to reflect back at us our own style. When it does not, we tend to not care for it. Look I do it as well, its one of the reasons I do not do book reviews.
Sure, I’ll tell someone, “Hey read that book” but I usually leave it at that.
I also worry about polluting a work with too many hands in the pot. I’ll admit I am a bit of a control freak when it comes to my style, voice, and final product. Telling a story is not like getting the kinks out of a computer game or a piece of hardware.
Related articles
- Be a Storyteller First (selfpubauthors.com)
- Your license, please. (hopeofglory.typepad.com)
- Nurturing the “Writer – Character” Relationship for Empowered Storytelling (creativeinsideout.com)












